Legal Opinion

Piper v. Queeney

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1924No. Appeal, 76PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bv

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

Plaintiff, Rosina Piper, owns a property on the west side of Palethorp Street in the City of Philadelphia, 17 feet in front and 63 feet in depth. Defendant, Joseph F. Queeney, Jr., owns the adjoining premises to the north, 20 feet in front and 190 feet in depth, extending to Second Street in the rear. Defendant, in planning to erect a garage on his lot, wished to utilize for this purpose a piece of land three feet wide, used as an alley, on the north side of plaintiff’s property, extending from Palethorp Street to a point beyond the rear of her house,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sears v. Scranton Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Anderson v. BestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Henry v. ZurfliehSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Yard v. PattonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  5. Buckley's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Grubb v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Cridge's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Conrad's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. In Re: Estate of Plance Appeal of: Plance, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Pronzato v. GuerrinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API