Legal Opinion
Ortberg v. Goldman Sachs Group
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 11, 2013No. Nos. 11-CV-125, 11-CV-440PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Senior Judge:
This case arises out of a series of protests held by Adam Ortberg, Michael Weber, and others at the District of Columbia offices of Goldman Sachs and the District of Columbia home of a Goldman Sachs’ employee, Michael Paese. On January 11, 2011, after a hearing in Superior Court, Goldman Sachs and Mr. Paese obtained a preliminary injunction restricting the protests.1 Mr. Ortberg and Mr. Weber now appeal the grant of that injunction and its scope. On this record, and for the reasons set forth below, we are constrained to reverse the trial court’s grant of a preliminary…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Waldon v. CovingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Homan v. GoyalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Drejza v. VaccaroDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND RAND SIMBERG v. MICHAEL E. MANN, NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. MICHAEL E. MANNDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Patricia Smith v. Hillary ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ronald Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- JANE DOE v. BERNABEI & WACHTEL, PLLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Smith v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.