Legal Opinion

Shehane v. Wimbish

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1925No. 16242, 16243PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. A motion to dismiss has been made by Wimbish, the defendant in error in the main bill of exceptions, on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the same. He contends that Lexington was not a city when the city court of Lexington was created by the General Assembly, and that, therefore, the city court of Lexington is not a constitutional city court, and the writ of error will not lie. The act incorporating the City of Lexington and the act creating the city court of Lexington were approved on the same day. The order in which they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Floyd County v. SalmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. In re Ah PahNevada Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Pelham Manufacturing Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Ross v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. In Re Poindexter v. Pettis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gaulden v. KirkSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Wirtz v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Wise, Simpson, Aiken & Associates, Inc. v. Rosser White Hobbs Davidson McClellan Kelly, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Wirtz v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Department of Banking & Finance v. Independent Insurance Agents of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API