Legal Opinion

Bierria v. Dickinson Manufacturing Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2001No. S-9489, S-9509PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Albert Bierria sued Dickinson Manufacturing after his fishing boat caught on fire and sank, alleging that the fire had been caused by a design defect in the boat's Dickinson stove. The jury concluded that the stove was defective but, despite Bierria's testimony that he had properly installed and maintained the stove, also concluded that the de- feet had not existed when the stove left Dickinson's possession. On appeal, Bierria argues that the jury's verdiet was unsupported by the evidence, given his allegedly uncon-troverted testimony that he had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kenneth Gumbs and Yvonne Gumbs v. International Harvester, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ahlstrom v. CummingsAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Leonard DRABIK, Appellee, v. STANLEY-BOSTITCH, INC., Defendant, Bostitch, a Division of Textron, Inc., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Noffke v. PerezAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Getchell v. LodgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Turner v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Luther v. LanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API