Legal Opinion

Tucker v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1990No. 85-964PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant Tucker, convicted of second-degree murder and four other counts, seeks to have his convictions set aside and the indictment dismissed with prejudice on the ground of violation of his speedy trial rights under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“IAD”), D.C.Code § 24-701 et seq. (1989). Finding the IAD inapplicable to this case, we affirm.

I

Appellant Tucker and his codefendant Albert Smith were charged with various crimes arising from the strangling of Frank Cheek and the wounding by pistol of two others who had publicly voiced their suspicions that Cheek…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Felix v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. In Re ShapiroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. WelkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. State v. WelkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Donahoo v. DortchKentucky Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API