Legal Opinion

Donahoo v. Dortch

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2004No. 2003-SC-0542-MRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant, Nathon 1 Donahoo, appeals as a matter-of-right 2 from an order of the Court of Appeals that denied his petition for extraordinary relief in which he sought a writ prohibiting his trial on a pending felony indictment. Appellant, who was serving a prison term at the time of the indictment, alleged that he was not brought to trial within one hundred and eighty (180) days after he filed a request pursuant to KRS 500.110 for trial on the indictment, and therefore, he asserts that he was entitled to a dismissal of the indictment. The Court of Appeals denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Tucker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Rosen v. WatsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goben v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. WelkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. State v. WelkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. James Lang v. Honorable Eric HanerKentucky Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API