Legal Opinion

Felix v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1986No. 83-1401PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Chief Judge:

Appellant argues in this appeal that his convictions on four counts of robbery 1 must be reversed, and the indictment against him dismissed, because his right to an expedited trial under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IAD or Act), D.C.Code §§ 24-701 et seq. (1981), was violated. We find that appellant’s rights under the IAD were not violated and, accordingly, affirm his convictions.

I

On July 15,1982, a complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia charging appellant with one count of robbery. Pursuant to that complaint, the Office of the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Michael Shane SpringerTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. BlackOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. LockCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Stephen Scott Crooker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. Runck v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API