Legal Opinion

Dries v. Gregor

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward F. McLaughlin, J.

Motions were made by the above-named defendants to strike the ad damnum clause of plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to the provisions of CPLR 3017 (subd [c]) so as to eliminate the amount of damages to which the plaintiffs deem themselves entitled.

Dr. Prahladkumar J. Agarwal is employed by defendant, Mercy Hospital of Watertown, and also conducts a private practice. Dr. David G. Gregor and Dr. Alan Henderson are private practitioners.

CPLR 3017 (subd [c]) became effective on August 26, 1976 which date was prior to the date of service of the complaint, except for the defendant, Alan Henderson,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McNeal v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Vigo v. New York HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. McNeal v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. McNeal v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API