Legal Opinion

Vigo v. New York Hospital

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward J. Greenfield, J.

The question presented in this motion by doctor and hospital defendants to strike the ad damnum clauses in each of the 10 causes of action asserted is one of far-reaching application and increasing importance to the bar.

While CPLR 3017 has been amended to eliminate ad damnum clauses in malpractice actions, and effective June 30, 1981 against municipalities, the statute is silent as to whether references can be made in a complaint to a specified sum of damages when there are alternative causes of action set forth, or where there are multiple…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jamaica Savings Bank v. M. S. Investing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Pizzingrilli v. Von KesselNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kaufman v. BrennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Kaufman v. BrennerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Dries v. GregorNew York Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rice v. VandenebosscheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API