Legal Opinion
McNeal v. Allen
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1980No. 46896-6Published
1Opinion of the Court
95 Wn.2d 265 (1980)
621 P.2d 1285
DONALD McNEAL, Respondent,
v.
F.F. ALLEN, ET AL, Appellants, L.W. KAHN, ET AL, Respondents.
No. 46896-6.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
December 31, 1980.
William H. Mays (of Gavin, Robinson, Kendrick, Redman & Mays), for appellants.
L.W. Kahn, pro se, and John Haggerty (of Mathew D. Griffin, Inc., P.S.), for respondents.
ROSELLINI, J.
The respondent brought this action for medical malpractice, seeking damages in the amount of $500,000. Responding to the complaint, the appellants asserted a counterclaim that this allegation violated RCW 4.28.360, and was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.