Legal Opinion

Furst v. Scharer

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1953No. Civ. 19422PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Plaintiff’s action herein was in the form of a common count for money had and received. The defendant D. Oliver Scharer was the seller, defendant Robert H. Eaton the broker, and defendant Altadena Escrow Corporation was the escrow agent, in a transaction involving the sale to plaintiff of the real property, equipment and goodwill of a bakery business in the city of Monrovia, which transaction plaintiff attempted to rescind prior to its consummation upon the ground of fraud. Trial before the court resulted in a judgment of nonsuit as to Eaton, the broker, and a judgment at the close of trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Baffa v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hefferan v. FreebairnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Norris v. San Mateo County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Ortzman v. Van Der WaalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wagner v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Petersen v. RidenourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Tibbets v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Bellwood Discount Corp. v. Empire Steel Buildings Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Bensinger v. DavidsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API