State v. Koshland
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Multnomah: M. G. Munly, Judge. The defendant, M. Koshland, was indicted for the crime of issuing a warehouse receipt for goods not actually in store.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Multnomah: M. G. Munly, Judge. The defendant, M. Koshland, was indicted for the crime of issuing a warehouse receipt for goods not actually in store. So much of the indictment as is necessary to a proper understanding of the case is as follows:— “ The said M. Koshland, on the twenty-eighth day of February, in the year eighteen hundred and ninety-three, in the county of Multnomah and state of Oregon, was then and there engaged in keeping, controlling, managing, and operating, as owner, a warehouse, and was then •and there doing business as such warehouseman, under the name of…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chiée Justice Lord.
The record discloses that a number of objections were made to the indictment, and exceptions taken to the admission of testimony, to the instructions of the court, and to the refusal of the court to give the instructions asked by the defendant. At the outset it is claimed that the act under which the defendant was indicted, tried, *181and convicted is contrary to section 20, article IV., of the state constitution, which provides that “Every act shall embrace but one subject and matters properly connected therewith, which subjects shall be expressed in the title;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- David v. Portland Water CommitteeOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- State ex rel. Stuart v. KinsellaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
3Cited by12 opinions
- Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Corvallis & Eastern R. Co. v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Micelli v. AndrusOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Calder v. OrrOregon Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.