Legal Opinion

Fifer v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1973No. 43393PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLaughlin, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment awarding damages to plaintiff. The action arose out of a farm accident in which plaintiff was injured. The jury returned a special verdict in which they found both defendant and plaintiff negligent and attributed 80 percent of the negligence to defendant and 20 percent to plaintiff. The jury determined plaintiff’s total damages to be $35,000. The trial court, pursuant to the jury’s determination that plaintiff was 20-percent negligent, ordered judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $28,000. Defendant made a motion for a new…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Carpenter v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Wilson v. SorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Knox v. City of Granite FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Young Ex Rel. Young v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Dawydowycz v. QuadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Parr v. CloutierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Adrian v. EdstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Hewitt v. Apollo GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API