Pedrick v. First National Bank of Ripon
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The demurrer admits the material allegations of the amended complaint.
The bank submits that the amended complaint is defective because it does not plead acceptance of its offer by the plaintiff or that there was consideration for its promise of employment. Plaintiff’s performance of the act which defendant had solicited, as alleged in his amended complaint, was both in consideration of the offer and an acceptance of it. “Where A promises B to pay him a sum of money if he will do a particular act and in consideration thereof, and B does that act, the promise thereupon becomes binding, although…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Van Dyke v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Ogg v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Phipps v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Chris Schroeder & Sons Co. v. Lincoln CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schmidt v. Department of Local Affairs & DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Scharping v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. First National Bank of Wisconsin Rapids v. M & I Peoples Bank of ColomaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Boehm v. WheelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Heyde Companies v. Dove Healthcare, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.