Legal Opinion

Boehm v. Wheeler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1974No. 312PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The following issues are presented on this appeal:

1. May a demurrer to a complaint be sustained on the basis that the claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations notwithstanding the absence of any allegation in the body of the complaint setting forth the date such action was commenced?

2. When did the plaintiffs’ causes of action accrue for purposes of determining when the statute of limitations began to run?

3. Does the statute of limitations commence to run at the time the plaintiff, in the exercise of reasonable care, is able to discover the negligent act or omission?

4. Is the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. Norse Chemical Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Peterson v. RoloffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Denzer v. RouseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Olson v. St. Croix Valley Memorial Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Reistad v. ManzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Bell v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Auric v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hennekens v. HoerlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Segall v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  5. Tamminen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API