Legal Opinion

Van Dyke v. Tax Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1935PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

George D. Van Dyke, the appellant, hereafter called the petitioner, is a retired lawyer and capitalist. His two-hundred-page brief submitted on this appeal evidences his ability, his great industry, and his deep interest in the questions raised. During the years 1930 to 1933, his sole business was that of investing his surplus capital. His capital holdings during those years included certain “nontaxable” highway investment bonds issued by Wisconsin counties pursuant to the provisions of sec. 1317m — 12, Stats. 1919, and certain other bonds issued by Wisconsin municipalities. The interest…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  5. Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. Warren v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hale v. State Bd. of Assessment and ReviewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Goodland v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API