Legal Opinion

People v. Hicks

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1975No. Docket 19898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, P. J.

We accept in its entirety Judge O’Hara’s recitation of the facts in this case. However, although we agree with his resolution of the issue concerning the alleged error in the jury instructions, we respectfully disagree with his legal conclusions concerning whether or not the prosecution’s failure to indorse the loiterers as res gestae witnesses was reversible error.

In the case at bar, out of all the people present at the time of the alleged offense, the prosecutor only indorsed the police officers as res gestae witnesses. However, the prosecutor has an affirmative duty to produce all res…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. KayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. HarrisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. SamuelsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. AbregoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. GillamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. HernandezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. LámarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. AbdoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API