Legal Opinion

People v. Gillam

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1979No. Docket 78-3423PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was charged with and convicted of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance, heroin, MCL 335.341(l)(a); MSA 18.1070(41)(l)(a), and sentenced to 1 year in prison. Defendant’s motion for a new trial, based on the same issues raised here, was denied on August 14, 1978. He appeals as of right, claiming (1) that the prosecutor failed to produce res gestae witnesses and (2) that a search warrant obtained and executed seven days after the delivery at issue was based on stale information.

Persons present at the scene of a crime are presumed to be res gestae witnesses able to testify…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. United States v. TownsendDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
  5. People v. SiemieniecMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. SundlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. DavidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. BaskinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. NorwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. ReynoldsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API