Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Schwartz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 4, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants, heirs-at-law of the decedent, from the allowance of the appellee’s final account as administrator, the issues centering upon the items wherein he credits himself as having paid to them their distributive shares, to one $1,990.45 and to the other $1,990.46. The trial court finds that the administrator paid to one of them $490.45 and to the other $490.46, and this finding is not attacked in the appeal. In the case of each, the remaining $1,500 of the amount due was not paid in cash, but by checks, the proceeds of which went into the personal account of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Collier v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Hewitt's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  3. Hall v. Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Goldberg v. KrayeskeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Mallory's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Satti v. RagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Hagey v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Carroll v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Setaro v. PernigottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Slitz v. Pyramid Custom Home Corp., No. Cv-96-0323247-S (Jun. 1, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API