Legal Opinion
Kloss v. Edward D. Jones & Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 2002No. 00-507PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler
¶1 The Appellant, Alice P. Kloss, opened financial services accounts with the Defendants, Edward D. Jones & Co. and Paul Husted, in 1992 and 1998. The agreement between Kloss and Jones contained predispute arbitration clauses. After Kloss filed a complaint in the District Court for the Eighth Judicial District in Cascade County in which she sought damages caused by Husted’s wrongful conduct, Jones filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration. The District Court granted the motion and Kloss appealed. While the appeal was pending, Jones located Kloss’ 1998 brokerage agreement which was at issue in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Iwen v. U.S. West DirectMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Iwen v. US West DirectMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Finkle and Ross v. AG Becker Paribas, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Agostino J. Zolezzi v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Dale Mortensen v. Bresnan CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Walker v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Snetsinger v. Montana University SystemMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Paulson v. Flathead Conservation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Kortum-Managhan v. HERBERGERS NBGLMontana Supreme Court · 2009
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.