Legal Opinion

Snetsinger v. Montana University System

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2004No. 03-238PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Appellants filed an action in the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, seeking a declaratory judgment that the Montana University System’s policy prohibiting employees from receiving dependent insurance coverage for their same-sex domestic partners violates their rights under the Montana Constitution. The Montana University System filed a Motion to Dismiss, which the District Court granted.

¶2 The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the Montana University System’s policy prohibiting gay employees from receiving insurance *151coverage for their same-sex domestic partners…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Pilgeram v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Montana Cannabis Industry Ass'n v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Benefis Healthcare v. GREAT FALLS CLINIC, LLP.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. GuillMontana Supreme Court · 2011

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API