Legal Opinion
Dumas v. Hollins
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 12, 1934No. 2 Div. 41PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
The record discloses that the present appeal was taken by O. D. Dumas, as guardian of Annie Hollins, a non compos mentis, National Surety Company, and the National Surety Corporation, “separately and severally,” from a decree of the probate court of Wilcox county against the said O. D. Dumas as such guardian, and in favor of his said ward for the sum of $6,577.59.
Errors are here separately assigned by each of the three named appellants.
On October 9, 1933, said O. D. Dumas filed his account and vouchers, and petition for a final settlement of his guardianship.
The court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Martin v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Baines v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Bean v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Alston v. Marengo County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Leach v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Guardianship of ZimmermanOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- McGraw v. McGrawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Rikard v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Cox v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Lane v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.