Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Zimmerman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1943No. 29246PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

As observed by the Court of Appeals in its opinion in this case: “An anomalous situation is presented by the undisputed facts in this record.”

There is a question whether under the relevant facts of this case more than one guardian was appointed. Then there is the principal question whether one who has solicited the appointment as guardian of the estates of minors may thereafter neglect the administration of his trust to the injury of the wards without the ■duty to account in full for the funds or property which his wards would have received had he not neglected .his trust. A final question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Telegraph Co. v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Goodrich, Admr. v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Willis v. FoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Dumas v. HollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. McLean v. HoseaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlackOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In Re Estate of WoodsOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. In Re Guardianship of ZimmermanOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Brandon v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. In re Guardianship of LindseyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API