Legal Opinion

Bean v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1925No. 4 Div. 147PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotjedin, J.

The appeal is from an order of the probate court granting a rehearing of a decree rendered on final settlement of a guardianship.

The proceeding was under the four-months’ statute, viz.:

“When rehearing granted within four months. When a party has been prevented from making his defense by surprise, accident, mistake, 'or fraud, without fault on his part, he may, in like manner, apply for a rehearing at any time within four months from the rendition of the judgment.”' Code 1923, § 9521 (5372).

The question is raised: Does this statute apply to proceedings in the probate court? Prior to the Code…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Evans v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Pharis v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Ingram v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Alston v. AlstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Englehardt v. Yung's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Courson v. TollisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Venable v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Farmer v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Rowe v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Dumas v. HollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API