Legal Opinion
Wallie W. Mattice, and Paul Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. Meyer
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1965No. 18016PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHES, Circuit Judge.
This appeal by Wallie W. Mattice and Paul Rhodes presents the novel situation of a private citizen of the State of Nebraska filing an unverified complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, for the avowed purpose of having Clarence A. H. Meyer (respondent) disbarred from the further practice of law in that court. Respondent was, at all times relevant to this proceeding, and presently is, the Attorney General of Nebraska. The complaint, which was filed on December 31, 1964, alleged, in substance, that respondent had violated the ' Canons of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1962
- Ginsburg v. SternDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Paul E. Rhodes v. Norval HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Paul Rhodes v. Dwain L. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Paul Ginsburg v. Horace Stern and Patrick N. BolsingerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
- Delfin Ramos Colon v. United States Attorney for the District of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Charles Ben Howell v. State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- In Re: Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr, United States Department of Justice v. Francis T. MandaniciCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Cotton v. SteeleNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.