Legal Opinion
Ginsburg v. Stern
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 26, 1954No. Civ. 12643PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, Chief Judge.
In conjunction with a motion to dismiss now pending before this court, the plaintiff has moved that Horace Stern be ordered to answer certain interrogatories pursuant to Federal Rules of Discovery.
The interrogatories are designed to develop evidence in support of plaintiff’s allegations of an alleged conspiracy on the part of Horace Stern, Chief Justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and Patrick N. Bolsinger, Prothonotary of the Western District of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, to deprive plaintiff of rights and privileges secured by the Federal Constitution and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Sylvester Lockhart, Jr. v. Charles A. Hoenstine, Prothonotary of the Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Milton McCray v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Kenney v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Robinson v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.