Legal Opinion

Paul Ginsburg v. Horace Stern and Patrick N. Bolsinger

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 22, 1955No. 11499_1PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Paul Ginsburg, as the court below found, has not stated a cause of action cognizable in a United States District Court under the Civil Rights Acts now embodied in 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, or under any other statute or rule of law. This is said without regard to the issue as to whether or not Ginsburg may máintain 'thé suit against the' Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania or the Prothonotary of that Court under our decision in Picking v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 3 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 240. We therefore will affirm the judgment of the court below on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  3. Ginsburg v. SternDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. Sylvester Lockhart, Jr. v. Charles A. Hoenstine, Prothonotary of the Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. Milton McCray v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  4. Kenney v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  5. Robinson v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API