In Re: Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr, United States Department of Justice v. Francis T. Mandanici
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Francis T. Mandanici, an attorney who resides in Connecticut, appeals pro se from final orders entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, dismissing his “ethics grievance” brought under the color of Rule V(A) of the American Bar Association’s Model Federal Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement,1 In re Starr, 986 F.Supp. 1159 (E.D.Ark.1997) (Starr II), and denying his motions for recusal. Id., 986 F.Supp. 1157 (E.D.Ark.1997) (Wright, J.); id., 986 F.Supp. 1159 (E.D.Ark.1997) (order) (Reasoner, C.J.). For reversal, Mandanici argues…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Akinaka v. Disciplinary Board of the Hawai'i Supreme CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Cotton v. SteeleNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Willhite v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Elmer Lucas v. Jerusalem Cafe, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Christina RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.