Legal Opinion

Siegfried v. Inspector General of the United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 10, 2001No. CV 01-4875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is a motion by the Stephen D. Siegfried (“Siegfried” or the “plaintiff’) to quash a subpoena duces tecum number 6357 issued by the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) to Northfork Bank, Mattituck, New York, pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. app. 3, § 6(a)(4), and in accordance with the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 (“RFPA”), 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3422. The Government opposes Siegfried’s motion on the grounds that: (1) it is untimely; and (2) the subpoena was properly issued, pursuant to the RFPA, to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Collins v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Douglas v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Thomas v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Hampton v. United States Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. Siegfried v. INSP. GEN., DEPT. OF AGRIC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API