Legal Opinion
Douglas v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 25, 2006No. M8-85 (LBS). No. C-03-4518PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion by third-party petitioners (“movants”) to quash subpoenas issued by the United States in the underlying action. The movants are eleven individuals whose financial records have been subpoenaed ' from Deutsche Bank. 1 The movants assert that the Right to Financial Privacy Act (“RFPA”), 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3422 (2005), prohibits these subpoenas because there is no reason to believe the information sought is relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry. See 12 U.S.C. § 3407(1) (Government may obtain financial records via judicial subpoena…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- James L. Rose and Judy S. Rose v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Harvey Jacobson and Marcia Jacobson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Feiner v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Thomas v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Irani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Irani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Hampton v. United States Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018