Guttmann v. Illinois Central R. Co
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
The trial court’s findings of facts — which are amply supported by the evidence and unquestionably are not “clearly erroneous” —establish that the directors acted well within their discretion in withholding declarations of dividends on the non-cumulative preferred stock up to the year 1948. In so holding, we assume, arguendo, that, as plaintiff insists, 1 2 the standard of discretion in weighing the propriety of the non-declaration of dividends on such preferred stock is far stricter than in the case of non-declaration of dividends on common stock. For, on the facts as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- United States v. FornessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Martin v. CampanaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Beidler & Bookmyer, Inc. v. Universal Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Levin v. Mississippi River Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Levin v. Mississippi River CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Kern v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Sanders v. Cuba Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Kelso v. KelsoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.