Legal Opinion

Guttmann v. Illinois Central R. Co

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 31, 1951No. 21801_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The trial court’s findings of facts — which are amply supported by the evidence and unquestionably are not “clearly erroneous” —establish that the directors acted well within their discretion in withholding declarations of dividends on the non-cumulative preferred stock up to the year 1948. In so holding, we assume, arguendo, that, as plaintiff insists, 1 2 the standard of discretion in weighing the propriety of the non-declaration of dividends on such preferred stock is far stricter than in the case of non-declaration of dividends on common stock. For, on the facts as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. United States v. FornessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Martin v. CampanaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Beidler & Bookmyer, Inc. v. Universal Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Levin v. Mississippi River Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Levin v. Mississippi River CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Kern v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. Sanders v. Cuba Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Kelso v. KelsoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API