Legal Opinion
Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 24, 1941No. 105PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves the question whether or not an injunction should issue to enforce an asserted implied negative covenant in a contract granting an exclusive license to use a secret formula for a food product. In the District Court the complaint was dismissed on the merits, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 36 F.Supp. 686, on the ground that the parties to the contract did not intend a negative covenant. Although the District Court may perhaps have emphasized “intent” more than is realistic as to matters concerning which the parties have not revealed their thinking processes, it is, of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National City Bank of NY v. HotchkissSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hotchkiss v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911
- Ernst v. Mechanics' & Metals Nat. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- King v. . LeightonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Borough of West Caldwell v. Borough of CaldwellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- James Bloor, as Reorganization Trustee of Balco Properties Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Martin v. CampanaroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Western Geophysical Company of America, Inc. v. Bolt Associates, Inc., Bolt Associates, Inc., Third-Party v. Litton Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.