Martin v. Campanaro
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. The Trustee has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no one of the claimants has a claim which by any possibility can exceed $200, and that none of the claimants has asked this court for leave to appeal pursuant to § 24 sub. a of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 47, sub. a. But obviously the claims aggregate more than $500; the Referee passed upon the claims as a group; the claimants, in effect, consolidated their claims in their petition for review, without objection from the Trustee; and the judge treated them as if consolidated. Such consolidation was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- United States v. FornessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Certified Fire Protection, Inc. v. Precision Construction, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Gee v. CBS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.