Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Anderson Ford, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 6, 1996No. 1951476PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Paul N. Johnson, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Anderson Ford, Inc. ("Anderson"), and Fred Jones Manufacturing Company ("Jones"), in this action seeking to recover compensatory damages based on allegations of breach of implied and express warranties, negligence, and innocent misrepresentation. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Johnson purchased from Anderson a new Ford F-250 diesel truck for personal and business use. The truck's engine later failed (as a result of a damaged piston), after the manufacturer's warranty had expired.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Spradlin v. SpradlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Wellcraft Marine v. ZarzourSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Rhodes v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. J.B. PlasticsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rampey v. Novartis Consumer Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Hobbs v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
  3. White v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
  4. Tasion Communications, Inc. v. Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. In re 100% Grated Parmesan Cheese Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API