Legal Opinion

Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1990No. 88-1152PublishedCited by 609 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of Balfour Guthrie, Inc. ("Balfour"),1 against Gerald Hanners d/b/a Newton Peanut Company ("Hanners") on Hanners's fraud claim with regard to the payment terms of two contracts entered into between Balfour and Hanners. We reverse and remand.

The issue for our review is whether a genuine issue of fact existed as to whether Hanners reasonably relied on alleged misrepresentations made by Balfour.

Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Munroe v. PritchettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  4. Greene v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Southern States Ford, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by609 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Williams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Wilma Corp. v. Fleming Foods of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. McClendon v. Mountain Top Flea MarketSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

604 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API