Wellcraft Marine v. Zarzour
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
These consolidated appeals present substantive questions of law concerning the applicability of the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine ("AEMLD") and the law of implied warranty:
1. Does the purchaser of a pleasure boat have a remedy under the AEMLD if he suffers economic loss as a result of damage to the boat arising out of an alleged defect in the boat?
2. Was there privity of contract between the boat manufacturer and the purchaser from a dealer so that the doctrine of implied warranty would apply against the manufacturer?
3. Can the purchaser of a pleasure boat recover damages…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- B & M HOMES, INC. v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Ex Parte AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- F. Becker Asphaltum Roofing Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Lloyd Wood Coal Co. v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Dairyland Ins. Co. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Alloway v. General Marine Industries, L.P.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Ruiz De Molina v. Merritt & Furman Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Trans States Airlines v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
- In re Myford Touch Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.