Merced Bank v. Price
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Mariposa County denying a new trial. J. J. Trabucco, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Geo. G. Gaucher, W. H. Larew, and W. S. Larew, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
Action to foreclose a mortgage. Plaintiff had judgment. Defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial. There is no appeal from the judgment. Neither the sufficiency of the complaint nor the sufficiency of the findings to support the judgment can be reviewed on this appeal. (Jenkins v. Frink, 30 Cal. 586, 596, [89 Am. Dec. 134];Shepard v. McNeil, 38 Cal. 72; Roberts v. Eldred, 73 Cal. 394, 398, [15 P. 16].) It was said in Moore v. Douglas,132 Cal. 399, [64 P. 705]: "The appeal from the judgment, not having been taken in time, cannot be considered; and the appellant's…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Churchill v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Dubbers v. GouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Yordi v. YordiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Van Der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Cummings v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Reardon v. Balaklala Corsol. Copper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1912
- Ross v. McDougalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Reclamation Dist. No. 673 v. DiepenbrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.