Legal Opinion
Van Der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Crane, Ch. J.
The judgment of the Appellate Division and of the Trial Term is affirmed. We desire to add our views upon the question of the Statute of Limitations.
This action is brought by the seller against the buyer to recover damages for breach of contract to purchase certain egg products. The contract was made between The Belgian Trading Company, the seller, and the defendant, Neuss, Hesslein & Co., Inc., a New York corporation, the buyer. The Belgian Trading Company is a trade name, the party in interest being the plaintiff, Laurent Van der Stegen. A contract of purchase was made between…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hurley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Wilson v. City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Johnson v. . Phoenix Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- George v. Mt. Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Meyer v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fox-Greenwald Sheet Metal Co., Inc. v. Markowitz Bros., Inc., Continental Casualty Co., Blake Construction Co., Inc., United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- In Re WilsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Smallwood v. Central Peninsula General HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.