Legal Opinion

In re Copeland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 15, 2001No. 06-00-00159-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice GRANT.

Michael Copeland has filed a petition asking this court to issue a writ of mandamus ordering the district judge to vacate or rescind his order compelling arbitration with Stanley Transportation, Inc. (Stanley).

In the underlying action, Copeland signed an agreement with his employer to arbitrate any tort action that he might subsequently have as a result of his employment. The arbitration agreement is a part of a larger document entitled “Stanley Transportation, Inc. Employee Injury Benefit Plan” (Plan).

Copeland was injured in a work-related accident. He filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Lawrence v. CDB Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. BDO Seidman v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Nationwide of Fort Worth, Inc. v. Wigington, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alashmawi v. IBP, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
  2. Hydro-Action, Inc. v. Craig (In Re Hydro-Action, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
  3. Alashmawi v. IBP, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API