Legal Opinion
Hydro-Action, Inc. v. Craig (In Re Hydro-Action, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas
Decided August 31, 2001No. 19-40537PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
BILL PARKER, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court for consideration are three “Motions to Compel Arbitration” filed by three of the respective Defendants, Bruce A. Craig, Julie Craig (referenced jointly as the “Craig Defendants”) and LaTrelle Mouton, in the above-refer enced adversary proceeding. 1 The Court conducted a hearing on the motion on August 21, 2001. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court took the matter under advisement to review the authorities relied upon by each party. This memorandum of decision disposes of all issues pending before the Court. 2
Factual…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. GaskampCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. v. GaskampCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Rushing v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC (In Re Rushing)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2010
- Cybertek, Inc. v. Bentley Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2002
- Fleetwood Ent Inc v. GaskampCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002