Legal Opinion

Muschik v. Conner-Muschik

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 1, 2018No. A17-1332Published

1Opinion of the CourtRodenberg, Judge

Appellant-husband DeWayne Francis Muschik challenges the district court's conclusion that a document that he and respondent-wife Nancy Jo Conner-Muschik signed before they married is not a valid and enforceable antenuptial agreement. Husband also challenges the district court's conclusions that a home jointly owned by the parties is marital property, and that an increase in the value of husband's interest in a business was attributable to his marital effort and is therefore marital property. Finally, husband argues that the district court erred when it awarded wife need-based attorney fees.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API