Muschik v. Conner-Muschik
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtRodenberg, Judge
Appellant-husband DeWayne Francis Muschik challenges the district court's conclusion that a document that he and respondent-wife Nancy Jo Conner-Muschik signed before they married is not a valid and enforceable antenuptial agreement. Husband also challenges the district court's conclusions that a home jointly owned by the parties is marital property, and that an increase in the value of husband's interest in a business was attributable to his marital effort and is therefore marital property. Finally, husband argues that the district court erred when it awarded wife need-based attorney fees.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.