Keller v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Chief Justice.
[T1] The appellant pled guilty to felony possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031(c)(ii) (LexisNexis 2007), reserving his right to appeal the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence. 1 We affirm because the investigative detention of the appellant did not violate either the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution or Article 1, § 4 of the Wyoming Constitution. Consequently, the district court did not err in denying the pretrial motion to suppress.
ISSUE
[T2] Did the investigative…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Damato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- McChesney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Meek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kunselman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Holman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Holman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008