Holman v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1DissentBurke, Justice
[1386] I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion holds that a warrantless search of a vehicle incident to the arrest of its driver is not permissible under Article 1, Section 4 of the Wyoming Constitution if "safety concerns or other exigent cireumstances surrounding the arrest and search are not discernable in the record." This holding, like the recent case of Pierce v. State, 2007 WY 182, 171 P.3d 525 (Wyo.2007), is inconsistent with Wyoming precedent establishing that the arrest itself is sufficient justification to search the arrested person and the area within his immediate control.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.