Legal Opinion

Kirkham v. Bailey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1927No. 12,917Published

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.

Action by appellant against appellees for malicious prosecution, it being charged in the complaint that appellees had maliciously caused two actions to be instituted and prosecuted against him. The complaint was in one paragraph, to which appellees successfully demurred for want of sufficient facts. Appellant refused to plead further, and judgment was rendered that he take nothing, and that appellees recover costs. Appeal is from this judgment, and the only error assigned is the action of the court in sustaining the demurrer.

The complaint shows on its face that the alleged malicious…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. RinkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McCullough v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Brooks v. MorganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Denton v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HarmlessIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API