Legal Opinion

Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Harmless

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1890No. 13,138PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellee is founded on a judgment rendered in his favor by a justice of the peace. The appellant filed an answer in two paragraphs. The substance of the first paragraph is this: On the 11th day of August, 1884, Alfred Pell, a constable of Van Burén town*26ship, Clay county, Indiana, in the cause named in the complaint, served process on William Eaglesfield, the agent of the defendant, at Lena, Parke county; the place where the service was made was not in the bailiwick of the constable; on the 24th day of August, James Girton, a justice of the peace, rendered judgment against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Smith v. HessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Harman v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Reid v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Rubush v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HindmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Clark v. HillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Cully v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. First National Bank v. HannaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Shane v. PeoplesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API