Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Harmless
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Clay Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint of the appellee is founded on a judgment rendered in his favor by a justice of the peace. The appellant filed an answer in two paragraphs. The substance of the first paragraph is this: On the 11th day of August, 1884, Alfred Pell, a constable of Van Burén town*26ship, Clay county, Indiana, in the cause named in the complaint, served process on William Eaglesfield, the agent of the defendant, at Lena, Parke county; the place where the service was made was not in the bailiwick of the constable; on the 24th day of August, James Girton, a justice of the peace, rendered judgment against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Smith v. HessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Harman v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Reid v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Rubush v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HindmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Clark v. HillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Cully v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- First National Bank v. HannaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Shane v. PeoplesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.