Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Lewandowski v. Callaway

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1984No. 81-1313, 82-1344PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

Floyd Lewandowski seeks review of a decision denying him a writ of mandamus. The writ he sought would have compelled a Wisconsin Patients Compensation Panel to consider his motion to reopen his case and to review its order which dismissed his case before the panel. Because we conclude that Lewandowski has a statutory right to have the panel consider his motion to reopen his case, we reverse the court of appeals’ decision and remand to the circuit court with directions to enter the writ of mandamus to compel the patients compensation panel to consider Lewandow-ski’s motion to reopen his case.

Th…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. Town of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Tamminen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Althouse v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Miller v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Howard v. DuerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Watton v. HegertyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. Blum v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  3. Keane v. St. Francis HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Iushewitz v. Milwaukee County Personnel Review BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hough v. Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API