Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Babcock
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 1950No. Civ. No. 14242PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order vacating a judgment against defendants and permitting them to file their answer and cross-complaint in the action.
On February 17, 1949, appellant commenced an action for an accounting and dissolution of a partnership and for $9,592.17 as advances made by him in excess of his partnership interest.
The complaint was served upon respondents Alfred Babcock and Ernest N. Milam on February 18 and upon Mary Babcock (wife of Alfred Babcock and mother of Milam) on March 5. On February 28, Alfred Babcock and Milam executed a stipulation for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Fickeisen v. PeeblerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Weck v. SucherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Troxell v. TroxellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Martin v. CinelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960