Legal Opinion
Fickeisen v. Peebler
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 1946No. Civ. 15475PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem.
The appeal of the defendants Byron and Ethel M. Peebler, taken herein is from the order made on January 14, 1946, granting plaintiff’s motion under section 473, Code of Civil Procedure, to vacate judgment, set aside the default, add new defendants and have summons issue. The action out of which such motion arises is one of a succession in the litigious history of a small cemetery known as Olive Lawn Memorial Park located near Norwalk, California. (Graceland v. Peebler (1942), 50 Cal.App.2d 545 [123 P.2d 527]; Peebler v. Olds (1942), 56 Cal.App.2d 8 [132 P.2d 233] ; Peebler…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Peebler v. OldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Bonfilio v. GangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Weck v. SucherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Orange Empire National Bank v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.