Chiles v. Crooks
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Ronald A. Chiles and Patrick R. Hollis, instituted this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 alleging that defendant Louis Crooks deprived them of their federal constitutional and statutory rights. Plaintiffs’ complaint also raises the pendent state law claims of malicious prosecution and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Crooks and Crooks’ employer, Security Group, Inc., d/b/a Wells Fargo Guard Services (hereinafter “Security Group”). Defendant Crooks has moved to dismiss the federal claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Charleston Joint Venture v. McPhersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- St. Mary of the Plains v. Higher Ed. Loan ProgramDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Bellamy v. Lt. R.C. BordersDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1989
- Willard v. City of Myrtle Beach, SCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1989
- Mickle v. AhmedDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.