Legal Opinion
Charleston Joint Venture v. McPherson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 6, 1992No. 23624PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chandler, Justice:
Richard and Hazel McPherson (The McPhersons) appeal an Order permanently enjoining them from entering upon the premises of Citadel Mall, in Charleston, and from “undertaking such activity to express and/or advance their theories, and/or ideas, and from any and all similar or related activity.” The Order does not prohibit the McPhersons from entering Citadel Mall for purposes of shopping.
We affirm.
FACTS
Charleston Joint Venture (CJV) is part owner of Citadel Mall (Mall); other Mall owners include Belks, Sears, and Thal-himers.
In late 1988, the McPhersons began parking their…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Republican Party of Texas v. DietzTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Empresas Puertorriqueñas de Desarrollo, Inc. v. Hermandad Independiente de Empleados TelefónicosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2000
- Eastwood Mall, Inc. v. SlancoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- New Jersey Coalition Against War in the Middle East v. J.M.B. Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- State v. WicklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.